The
reference section in the library at my school is miniscule. Most of
the books in this section are specialized and specific to our local
geography and culture. This seems like a win...until the eye is
caught by a set of World Book Encyclopedias. This already looks out
of place in the tiny reference section. The drab brown covers look
old and worn next to the newer more colourful books, but the set
itself takes up quite a bit of real estate. Upon further
investigation I find that the set is from 1997. Why would a library
keep a 22 year old set of encyclopedias? Is it that we feel an
obligation to them? This is, after all, the only set in the library.
Perhaps the librarian feels that it is her duty to house one set. Or
maybe there's some nostalgia over her own experience as a student
using the World Books to look up information. Riedling argues that
“In all formats, encyclopedias remain essential reference sources
for school libraries. A majority of ready-reference as well as
research questions (to a degree), can be answered using
encyclopedias, in all formats.” (71)
I
can see a number of issues with this set in particular. The first and
most
obvious is that the information in the set is not current. Take
a look at the entries on computers, the planets (remember when Pluto
qualified as the 9th planet in our solar system before being downgraded to dwarf?) or computers and the information in there is no longer
relevant. Even the entry on terrorism is too old to include the most
prominent attack of our generation.Of course, there will be many
entries (such as historical events and figures) that will not change, but some
relevant information is not justification enough to keep it on the
shelves.
![]() |
| World Book, 1997 |
Secondly,
the set is not a children's set and this is a K-7 library. The
population of users who will be willing to pick up the encyclopedia
and be able to understand the language and content is very small.
![]() |
| World Book, 1997 |
Third,
the condition of the set is not good. In leafing through them there
are a number of damaged pages and some pages are missing. The covers
are dingy
![]() |
| World Book, 1997 |
Finally,
the school subscribes to a number of online databases, including 7 by
World Book. These databases have already superseded the ancient print
set on the shelf.
The
World Book Encyclopedia, 1997
Evaluation
of an Encyclopedia
|
Poor
|
Acceptable
|
Exceptional
|
Age
|
-
published 15+ years ago
|
-
published within last 10 years
|
-
published <5 years
|
Authority
|
-
publisher is not reputable
-
does not have prominent contributors
|
-
may have some prominent contributors/authors
|
-
reputable publisher
-
scholarly, prominent contributors/authors
|
Format
|
-
few to no illustrations
-
black and white illustrations
-
print is small/difficult to decipher
-
index is difficult to
locate and/or decipher
-
organizational features (such as alphabetized headings) are small
or unclear
-
covers are unattractive
|
-
some illustrations
-
some colour illustrations
-
print is somewhat easy to decipher
-
index is accessible
-
organizational features are somewhat user-friendly
-
covers are adequately attractive
|
-
several engaging and informative illustrations
-
colour illustrations
-
clear and easy to decipher print
-
easily understood and accessible index and organizational features
-
engaging and attractive covers
|
Scope
|
-
source is intended for age
lower or higher than target
group
-
subject coverage is not uniform
-
information is dated
-
current issues are not covered
|
-
source may be somewhat appropriate for intended age group
-
subject coverage is somewhat uniform
-
some information is dated
-
some current issues are covered
|
-
source is intended for age group that is using it
-
subject coverage is uniform
-
information is current
-
current issues are covered
|
Condition
|
-
set is incomplete
-
pages damaged and/or missing
-
broken spines and/or covers separating from book
-
dirty pages and covers
|
-
books are intact, no missing pages
-
any damage is minimal and does not affect use
-
there may be some wear and tear on the covers
|
-
no missing pages
-
no damage
-
little to no wear and tear
-
covers and pages are clean
|
*Rubric
criteria adapted and expanded upon from Riedling's Reference
Skills for the School Librarian (p.
72)
Since
we already subscribe to the current databases, one might argue that
this set should simply be weeded and not replaced. However, Riedling
quotes “Do encyclopedias still matter? As school librarians, we
believe that diversity in format, as well as in content, is vital to
the reference collection. The ideal library [should] have numerous
encyclopedias in many formats” (Quinn, 253). (71) Online resources
are easy, cheaper and updated much more frequently, but kids also
need to learn how to use print resources and they actually enjoy
the process of looking through
books. I do not, however believe that the library should invest in
another set of World Books. The current set is $999 (worldbook.com), an entire year's
budget for some libraries. Last year's set is $699 which isn't much
better. Spending that money only to have another outdated set of
encyclopedias on the shelf in 5 years is not worth it.
![]() |
| DK Books, dk.com |
The
books I'm recommending for replacing the dated encyclopedias are DK's
Smithsonian series. Smithsonian's The New Children's
Encyclopedia was published in
January, 2019 and is 304 pages. As
described on DK's website, the encyclopedia “Prepare[s]
to build your knowledge on a wide range of topics--including Earth
and beyond, plants and animals, history and politics, science,
technology, and the human body--arranged thematically with more than
9,000 indexed entries and 2,500 colorful images. Cross-reference
icons encourage children to explore and discover linked information,
feeding their curiosity and building their general knowledge.” I
particularly like the cross-referencing feature in this book as it
leads kids on the path of discovery much like we want them to do
during the inquiry process. The pages in the book are filled with
colourful, bright and detailed illustrations and photographs paired
with simple, easy to understand text. These are great for the
ready-reference type of user. Priced at $38.99 on the DK website and
at kidsbooks.ca, and slightly less ($34.74) on amazon.ca for the
hardcover, this book will not break the library's budget and can
easily be replaced as and when it becomes outdated.
The
Smithsonian series also has a number of other books that specialize
in certain topics, ranging from the human body to dinosaurs to music
that can be added to the collection to compliment the main
encyclopedia. One of the major benefits of using these books is that
they do not have to be purchased as a complete set. The expenditure
can be spread out over time and the book topics can be tailored to
meet the needs of the library users.
The
New Children's Encyclopedia
Evaluation
of an Encyclopedia
|
Poor
|
Acceptable
|
Exceptional
|
Age
|
-
published 15+ years ago
|
-
published within last 10 years
|
-
published <5 years
|
Authority
|
-
publisher is not reputable
-
does not have prominent contributors
|
-
may have some prominent contributors/authors
|
-
reputable publisher
-
scholarly, prominent contributors/authors
|
Format
|
-
few to no illustrations
-
black and white illustrations
-
print is small/difficult to decipher
-
index is difficult to locate and/or decipher
-
organizational features (such as alphabetized headings) are small
or unclear
-
covers are unattractive
|
-
some illustrations
-
some colour illustrations
-
print is somewhat easy to decipher
-
index is accessible
-
organizational features are somewhat user-friendly
-
covers are adequately attractive
|
-
several engaging and informative illustrations
-
colour illustrations
-
clear and easy to decipher print
-
easily understood and accessible index and organizational features
-
engaging and attractive covers
|
Scope
|
-
source is intended for age lower or higher than target group
-
subject coverage is not uniform
-
information is dated
-
current issues are not covered
|
-
source may be somewhat appropriate for intended age group
-
subject coverage is somewhat uniform
-
some information is dated
-
some current issues are covered
|
-
source is intended for age group that is using it
-
subject coverage is uniform
-
information is current
-
current issues are covered
|
Condition
|
-
set is incomplete
-
pages damaged and/or missing
-
broken spines and/or covers separating from book
-
dirty pages and covers
|
-
books are intact, no missing pages
-
any damage is minimal and does not affect use
-
there may be some wear and tear on the covers
|
-
no missing pages
-
no damage
-
little to no wear and tear
-
covers and pages are clean
|
*Rubric
criteria adapted and expanded upon from Riedling's Reference
Skills for the School Librarian (p.
72)
Works Cited & References
DK Children. The New Children's Encyclopedia. 2019.
Riedling,
Ann. Reference Skills for the School Librarian: Tools and Tips, 3rd
Edition. ABC-CLIO. Kindle Edition.
World Book Inc. The World Book Encyclopedia. 1997




We focused on a similar issue - I agree, the DK Smithsonian books are such a nice presentation of information for elementary school aged students. Regarding your 1997 collection, poor students who want to research "cats" are out of luck!
ReplyDeleteAlso, Pluto is still a planet ;) a dwarf planet, but still a planet (sorry, it's my favourite).
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/dwarf-planets/pluto/in-depth/
LOL - Ok, I stand corrected on the Pluto issue, however I'm sure my Encyclopedia set would beg to differ on the dwarf issue! I will edit to give Pluto the credit it deserves. ;)
DeleteI actually tried to look up "Canada" while preparing for this paper. Not a good situation with this poor old set.
;)
DeleteI always love having these kinds of conversations with kids, because naturally at a young age they see things as either black or white. It is fun to stretch them into learning that things change. This comes up often with maps and country boarders, too!
I like your approach here with the DK Smithsonian series. Even though I love World Book, and having up to date sets is awesome, there is no denying the heavy cost to a TL's elementary school library budget. Being able to purchase the books individually really helps stretch those costs out and provide better resources depending on the location. I also like the high interest satellite books to complement the main encyclopedias. Tackling the format battle when it comes to print or digital is such a point of contention for many TL's, teachers, and most anyone who does research. I am in favour of having print based encyclopedias in the library (even though we have a digital subscription) for one specific reason, that they help students who are researching learn a categorization strategy by which to organize information. An analogy of this process is how many artists are moving to digital formats. The artist still has to use very similar analog strategies to achieve a finished product and the best way to understand this process is to experiment in both formats. Students too can experiment in information based formats to achieve a greater skill set of how to organize knowledge or even efficiency of thought. Overall I think your evaluation and suggested replaced of this resource is a solid one and I think this report looks professional.
ReplyDeleteGreat find, Jennifer! The DK Smithsonian books are always full of great images, text features, etc. and SO much more economical than a traditional encyclopedia set. Using Jennifer's idea from her assignment one paper, and adding smaller subject area references on top of these (budget allowing) will create a comprehensive, elementary and diverse learning appropriate resource set for your library. The added bonus that you mentioned (not everything becomes out-of-date as quickly as technologies, space etc.) allows us to use our budget carefully and only update where necessary. Very wise!
ReplyDeleteI like that you suggest replacing he heavy, expensive set of encyclopedias with a more condensed, child friendly version. I find, like you, that a lot of our reference materials are written for adults and are only accessible to a small minority of students at my school. I have a dated set of Britannicas in my library. I lent half of the set to the drama teacher as a prop last year. They still have them and no one has seemed to notice. So I'm not sure that I agree with Reidling that every library "needs" to have a set of print encyclopedias. I think that good electronic databases and more affordable nonfiction books can do the job.
ReplyDelete